# Epoch and Equinox

We use the term epoch (of a given date) to refer to the actual measured coordinates of a star that takes into account precession, nutation, and proper motion. The term equinox means that the coordinates have been precessed to a given date, but that other factors affecting a star’s position have not been applied. So, equinox 2000.0 is not the same as epoch 2000.0.

Example: Barnard’s Star

Epoch 2000.0 coordinates: α = 17h 57m 48.49803s, δ = +4° 41′ 36.2072″ (the actual position of Barnard’s Star at 0h UT on January 1, 2000, accounting for precession, nutation, and proper motion)

Equinox 2017.1 coordinates: α = 17h 58m 39.20689s, δ = +4° 41′ 33.5614″ (coordinates have been precessed from epoch 2000.0 above to today’s date, but nutation and proper motion have not been applied)

Epoch 2017.1 coordinates: α = 17h 58m 37.85s, δ = +4° 44′ 37.8″ (the actual position of Barnard’s Star on January 19, 2017, accounting for precession, nutation, and proper motion)

Sometimes, the epochal coordinates are further adjusted to account for aberration and atmospheric refraction.  The latter tends to “lift” stars towards the zenith—the closer to the horizon the greater the lift.

## 3 thoughts on “Epoch and Equinox”

1. Patrick Watson says:

Where did you get the decimal part of the equinox and epoch dates?
How is this calculated in each case?
Much obliged.
Regards,
Patrick

1. Hi Patrick,

The decimal part of the equinox and epoch dates is the fractional portion of a year that has occurred by a given date. In the example above, 0 hours UT on January 19, 2017 is 0.049 of the way between 0 hours UT January 1, 2017 and 0 hours UT January 1, 2018, so rounding to one decimal place, 0.0, I should have written 2017.0 instead of 2017.1.

It may be helpful to look at a day-of-the-year calendar, such as this one: